• In case Jewish holidays aren't your thing, remember that there is a Festivus for the rest of us!
  • Merry Christmas guys! Tonight we burn the oil full chooch!

Debate @Catbert on what makes a Lolcow a Lolcow

I find mental illness hilarious. Especially when the mental illness in question manifests by making him sing for chicken nuggies from his mother and dress up in her nightgown and sunhat to do an interpretive dance about feminism. Broaden your horizons fat people is so Kiwi Farms.
To be fair, I never found Chris Chan, Ralph or any of the lolcows KF obsesses over. To be any funny
I agree none of these people really are all that interesting. and it's kind of sad that Moderator here enjoys watching people suffer for their mental illness. For his own personal amusement. I think it shows a lack of character on his part.
 
Chris-Chan is very interesting and has his funny moments. He's the most documented individual in world history. People don't spend untold man-hours documenting shit, for free mind you, if it's uninteresting or not funny.
 
I don't really give a fuck, because it's hard to believe they're so retarded that they don't recognise that someone is fucking with them. Each time they answer back.
And the ultimate answer is just to ignore it all.
But it's a like a car crash we need to be rubber necking.
Rekieta and Ralph are dumb, but they would be in a home if they were that dumb. In some cases, disease isn't an excuse.
I never really understand why Josh and company are so obnoxiously obsessed with the two of them.
 
I admitted I was wrong
Apparently gargamel hasn't let it Go
and said I would calm down but you are still mad? Ok get it out, get it all out.
Not at all however neither of you two or creating a welcoming environment for new people. Ken and Josh don't behave this way towards people. Despite their own flaws they don't treat everyone that joins their web forum with this level of scrutiny. Requiring somebody just hands over there previous posting history to a website that has nothing to do with this one. Is invasive and unnecessary. I don't think a lot of people would be okay with this.
 
Nobody yet however if you treat one person this way you're bound to treat others this way.
Crying about nothing once again, I see.

Still waiting for that furfag invasion that you claim will be the death of this forum.
 
Crying about nothing once again, I see.

Still waiting for that furfag invasion that you claim will be the death of this forum.
You know what is one of Josh's unique character flaws is his inability to ever course correct. Which you should probably do before you end up crashing this website in any potential user base you could have garnered.
 
Josh don't behave this way towards people.
Have you completely ignored the several dozens of screenshots on OF, of Josh acting like an asshole towards his userbase?

The reason why you are scrutinised, is because you are acting suspect and demanding to ban several groups from this site. Which ultimately will slow down growth a lot more.
You come across as a shitstirrer.
 
Have you completely ignored the several dozens of screenshots on OF, of Josh acting like an asshole towards his userbase?
"I'm familiar with Josh's behavior towards the user base, and I know he can be an asshole. However, in the context of signing up and participating in the community, I've never seen him exert this level of pressure. Yelling at people, using derogatory language, and banning them for arbitrary and contradictory reasons is not typical of Josh. On the other hand, Gargamel's behavior is unreasonable and demanding, driven by his own paranoid suspicions, and he's overstepping his boundaries.".
The reason why you are scrutinised, is because you are acting suspect
Do you realize that the claim 'you're acting suspect' is extremely vague and nebulous. It's a subjective judgment that lacks concrete evidence or specific examples. Without more context or clarification, it's impossible to address or respond to such a general accusation.
and demanding to ban several groups from this site. Which ultimately will slow down growth a lot more.
You come across as a shitstirrer.
Weeding out bad elements isn't stirring up drama, it's just basic community maintenance. You gotta pull the weeds so the good stuff can grow. Letting toxic users run wild will just choke out the rest of the community.

And I also conceded and said completely banning them is impractical, all we can do is not roll out the welcome mat for them and let them settle in. Lest you have the same issues the plague the other two farms.

I didn't think a thought experiment and discussion thread would warrant this level of scrutiny, but I guess that's where we are now.
 
Weeding out bad elements isn't stirring up drama,
Catbert if you want to have a say in what is considered bad elements you should probably contribute something to the site that isn't a suspiciously young looking girl posing nude.
 
"I'm familiar with Josh's behavior towards the user base, and I know he can be an asshole. However, in the context of signing up and participating in the community, I've never seen him exert this level of pressure. Yelling at people, using derogatory language, and banning them for arbitrary and contradictory reasons is not typical of Josh.
While ignoring the fact that even people that aren't socks, are commonly banned for being suspected as socking on KF. I don't think you're as familiar with his behaviour as you think you are.
Do you realize that the claim 'you're acting suspect' is extremely vague and nebulous. It's a subjective judgment that lacks concrete evidence or specific examples. Without more context or clarification, it's impossible to address or respond to such a general accusation.
I actually believe you are a user of the news-board at KF, because they have a peculiar sort of writing style.
Weeding out bad elements isn't stirring up drama, it's just basic community maintenance.
Maybe at a normie forum, but we are here to laugh at people. Do you even understand what a lolcow-forum is? @Gargamel being a former furry sets him up to a position to tard wrangle the furry crowd better too.
Letting toxic users run wild will just choke out the rest of the community.
Sir, you are the toxic user.
And I also conceded and said completely banning them is impractical, all we can do is not roll out the welcome mat for them and let them settle in. Lest you have the same issues the plague the other two farms.
What issues tho? If you leave them alone, they leave you alone. It's all up to you if you want the drama or not.
I didn't think a thought experiment and discussion thread would warrant this level of scrutiny, but I guess that's where we are now.
This reminds me of a 5 year old not getting what he wants, and being all melodramatic.
 
Last edited:
While ignoring the fact that even people that aren't socks, are commonly banned for being suspected as socking on KF. I don't think you're as familiar with his behaviour as you think you are.

I actually believe you are a user of the news-board at KF, because they have a peculiar sort of writing style.

Maybe at a normie forum, but we are here to laugh at people. Do you even understand what a lolcow-forum is? @Gargamel being a former furry sets him up to a position to tard wrangle the furry crowd better too.

Sir, you are the toxic user.

What issues tho? If you leave them alone, they leave you alone. It's all up to you if you want the drama or not.

This reminds me of a 5 year old not getting what he wants, and being all melodramatic.
This you bro
Screenshot_20240909-173627-01.jpeg
 
Back
Top