View attachment 2713
Lol he made an angry comment about hating muslims and loving muslim child death then walked it back because he knew it was indefensible and makes him look like a pedo-sadistic psycho, there's no "joking" to it and even if there is why is your drunk moron moderator joking that he enjoys seeing kids suffer?
Ken you are such a dumpy sack of dog shit it's insane. It's too bad that guy whose grave you pissed on didn't convince you to kill yourself.
Well it makes sense you'd say that, it's not like you're in much of a better circumstance than your enemy.Eh, not the worst looking 65 year old I've seen.
Well it makes sense you'd say that, it's not like you're in much of a better circumstance than your enemy.
To be fair, it's weird af of Ken to follow this slapfight this much. Like, is it that fun?
I'm half his age, I do 100% of the development and maintenance of Lounge 96 on my own, and I'm not employed as a fudge wiper. Did I mention I'm Jewish? I fail to see your point,Well it makes sense you'd say that, it's not like you're in much of a better circumstance than your enemy.
I'm half his age, I do 100% of the development and maintenance of Lounge 96 on my own, and I'm not employed as a fudge wiper. Did I mention I'm Jewish? I fail to see your point,.
Also, Ken isn't my enemy.
I guess you could say Ken came groveling back, since his caretaker Pedofails rage quit.When you're bored? Fucking ABSOLUTELY.
That's cool. I think without me Vingle is pretty much the only poster here and he spent the last page talking about how he gets turned on by Muslim child death so that seems to be what you're stuck with. At least Ken has more than one pretend friend on the computer.I'm half his age, I do 100% of the development and maintenance of Lounge 96 on my own, and I'm not employed as a fudge wiper. Did I mention I'm Jewish? I fail to see your point,.
Also, Ken isn't my enemy.
How are you this delusional, that you get me feeling bad for muslim women. To be a long ass rant about wanting genocide on muslim children?I think without me Vingle is pretty much the only poster here and he spent the last page talking about how he gets turned on by Muslim child death so that seems to be what you're stuck with.
All he said was Muslim women get treated shitty. Nowhere did he say he wants to see Muslim kids hurt.That's cool. I think without me Vingle is pretty much the only poster here and he spent the last page talking about how he gets turned on by Muslim child death so that seems to be what you're stuck with. At least Ken has more than one pretend friend on the computer.
tl;drOn my way out here's an AMA statement on teen gender transitioning.
CHICAGO — The American Medical Association (AMA) today urged governors to oppose state legislation that would prohibit medically necessary gender transition-related care for minor patients, calling such efforts “a dangerous intrusion into the practice of medicine.” In a letter to the National Governors Association (NGA), the AMA cited evidence that trans and non-binary gender identities are normal variations of human identity and expression, and that forgoing gender-affirming care can have tragic health consequences, both mental and physical.
“Decisions about medical care belong within the sanctity of the patient-physician relationship,” the AMA wrote in its letter. “As with all medical interventions, physicians are guided by their ethical duty to act in the best interest of their patients and must tailor recommendations about specific interventions and the timing of those interventions to each patient’s unique circumstances. Such decisions must be sensitive to the child’s clinical situation, nurture the child’s short and long-term development, and balance the need to preserve the child’s opportunity to make important life choices autonomously in the future. We believe it is inappropriate and harmful for any state to legislatively dictate that certain transition-related services are never appropriate and limit the range of options physicians and families may consider when making decisions for pediatric patients.”
The complete text of the letter is below, and a pdf copy can be downloaded by clicking here.
Dear Mr. McBride:
On behalf of the American Medical Association (AMA) and our physician and medical student members, I write to urge the National Governors Association (NGA) and its member governors to oppose state legislation that would prohibit the provision of medically necessary gender transition-related care to minor patients. We believe this legislation represents a dangerous governmental intrusion into the practice of medicine and will be detrimental to the health of transgender children across the country.
Empirical evidence has demonstrated that trans and non-binary gender identities are normal variations of human identity and expression. For gender diverse individuals, standards of care and accepted medically necessary services that affirm gender or treat gender dysphoria may include mental health counseling, non-medical social transition, gender-affirming hormone therapy, and/or gender-affirming surgeries. Clinical guidelines established by professional medical organizations for the care of minors promote these supportive interventions based on the current evidence and that enable young people to explore and live the gender that they choose. Every major medical association in the United States recognizes the medical necessity of transition-related care for improving the physical and mental health of transgender people.
Arkansas’ recently enacted SAFE Act and similar bills pending in several other states would insert the government into clinical decision-making and force physicians to disregard clinical guidelines. Decisions about medical care belong within the sanctity of the patient-physician relationship. As with all medical interventions, physicians are guided by their ethical duty to act in the best interest of their patients and must tailor recommendations about specific interventions and the timing of those interventions to each patient’s unique circumstances. Such decisions must be sensitive to the child’s clinical situation, nurture the child’s short and long-term development, and balance the need to preserve the child’s opportunity to make important life choices autonomously in the future. We believe it is inappropriate and harmful for any state to legislatively dictate that certain transition-related services are never appropriate and limit the range of options physicians and families may consider when making decisions for pediatric patients.
In addition, evidence has demonstrated that forgoing gender-affirming care can have tragic consequences. Transgender individuals are up to three times more likely than the general population to report or be diagnosed with mental health disorders, with as many as 41.5 percent reporting at least one diagnosis of a mental health or substance use disorder.1 The increased prevalence of these mental health conditions is widely thought to be a consequence of minority stress, the chronic stress from coping with societal stigma, and discrimination because of one’s gender identity and expression. Because of this stress, transgender minors also face a significantly heightened risk of suicide.
Transgender children, like all children, have the best chance to thrive when they are supported and can obtain the health care they need. Studies suggest that improved body satisfaction and self-esteem following the receipt of gender-affirming care is protective against poorer mental health and supports healthy relationships with parents and peers.2 Studies also demonstrate dramatic reductions in suicide attempts, as well as decreased rates of depression and anxiety.3 Other studies show that a majority of patients report improved mental health and function after receipt of gender-affirming care. Medically supervised care can also reduce rates of harmful self-prescribed hormones, use of construction-grade silicone injections, and other interventions that have potential to cause adverse events.4
It is imperative that transgender minors be given the opportunity to explore their gender identity under the safe and supportive care of a physician. Arkansas’s law and others like it would forestall that opportunity. This is a dangerous intrusion into the practice of medicine and we strongly urge the NGA and its member governors to oppose these troubling bills.
We thank you for the opportunity to express our views on this important issue.
Sincerely,
James L. Madara, MD
CEO and EVP, American Medical Association
That's cool. I think without me Vingle is pretty much the only poster here and he spent the last page talking about how he gets turned on by Muslim child death so that seems to be what you're stuck with. At least Ken has more than one pretend friend on the computer.
On my way out here's an AMA statement on teen gender transitioning.
CHICAGO — The American Medical Association (AMA) today urged governors to oppose state legislation that would prohibit medically necessary gender transition-related care for minor patients, calling such efforts “a dangerous intrusion into the practice of medicine.” In a letter to the National Governors Association (NGA), the AMA cited evidence that trans and non-binary gender identities are normal variations of human identity and expression, and that forgoing gender-affirming care can have tragic health consequences, both mental and physical.
“Decisions about medical care belong within the sanctity of the patient-physician relationship,” the AMA wrote in its letter. “As with all medical interventions, physicians are guided by their ethical duty to act in the best interest of their patients and must tailor recommendations about specific interventions and the timing of those interventions to each patient’s unique circumstances. Such decisions must be sensitive to the child’s clinical situation, nurture the child’s short and long-term development, and balance the need to preserve the child’s opportunity to make important life choices autonomously in the future. We believe it is inappropriate and harmful for any state to legislatively dictate that certain transition-related services are never appropriate and limit the range of options physicians and families may consider when making decisions for pediatric patients.”
The complete text of the letter is below, and a pdf copy can be downloaded by clicking here.
Dear Mr. McBride:
On behalf of the American Medical Association (AMA) and our physician and medical student members, I write to urge the National Governors Association (NGA) and its member governors to oppose state legislation that would prohibit the provision of medically necessary gender transition-related care to minor patients. We believe this legislation represents a dangerous governmental intrusion into the practice of medicine and will be detrimental to the health of transgender children across the country.
Empirical evidence has demonstrated that trans and non-binary gender identities are normal variations of human identity and expression. For gender diverse individuals, standards of care and accepted medically necessary services that affirm gender or treat gender dysphoria may include mental health counseling, non-medical social transition, gender-affirming hormone therapy, and/or gender-affirming surgeries. Clinical guidelines established by professional medical organizations for the care of minors promote these supportive interventions based on the current evidence and that enable young people to explore and live the gender that they choose. Every major medical association in the United States recognizes the medical necessity of transition-related care for improving the physical and mental health of transgender people.
Arkansas’ recently enacted SAFE Act and similar bills pending in several other states would insert the government into clinical decision-making and force physicians to disregard clinical guidelines. Decisions about medical care belong within the sanctity of the patient-physician relationship. As with all medical interventions, physicians are guided by their ethical duty to act in the best interest of their patients and must tailor recommendations about specific interventions and the timing of those interventions to each patient’s unique circumstances. Such decisions must be sensitive to the child’s clinical situation, nurture the child’s short and long-term development, and balance the need to preserve the child’s opportunity to make important life choices autonomously in the future. We believe it is inappropriate and harmful for any state to legislatively dictate that certain transition-related services are never appropriate and limit the range of options physicians and families may consider when making decisions for pediatric patients.
In addition, evidence has demonstrated that forgoing gender-affirming care can have tragic consequences. Transgender individuals are up to three times more likely than the general population to report or be diagnosed with mental health disorders, with as many as 41.5 percent reporting at least one diagnosis of a mental health or substance use disorder.1 The increased prevalence of these mental health conditions is widely thought to be a consequence of minority stress, the chronic stress from coping with societal stigma, and discrimination because of one’s gender identity and expression. Because of this stress, transgender minors also face a significantly heightened risk of suicide.
Transgender children, like all children, have the best chance to thrive when they are supported and can obtain the health care they need. Studies suggest that improved body satisfaction and self-esteem following the receipt of gender-affirming care is protective against poorer mental health and supports healthy relationships with parents and peers.2 Studies also demonstrate dramatic reductions in suicide attempts, as well as decreased rates of depression and anxiety.3 Other studies show that a majority of patients report improved mental health and function after receipt of gender-affirming care. Medically supervised care can also reduce rates of harmful self-prescribed hormones, use of construction-grade silicone injections, and other interventions that have potential to cause adverse events.4
It is imperative that transgender minors be given the opportunity to explore their gender identity under the safe and supportive care of a physician. Arkansas’s law and others like it would forestall that opportunity. This is a dangerous intrusion into the practice of medicine and we strongly urge the NGA and its member governors to oppose these troubling bills.
We thank you for the opportunity to express our views on this important issue.
Sincerely,
James L. Madara, MD
CEO and EVP, American Medical Association
Hopefully educated and experienced opinions like this will win out over drooling psychopathy of every moronic transphobe I've bumped into. Peace.
Sorry @Vingle , you bigoted fuck, but a faith that can build things likes the Shah mosque or Registan Square can't be pure evil. Behavior towards women varies a lot among predominantly Islamic countries, for instance they are treated very respectfully in Lebanon and women have equal rights in Sweden and Britain. Even in whack job countries like Iran there are serious critics to the status quo like Jafar Panahi and there have been mass protests against their morality police.
ewGuessing by that picture of your foot I would say that you're the one who's more likely to die of a heart problem than him.
And did you actually SEE that whole video? It was hysterical. You know I actually thought that guy was military? That's how clean and under control his firing was. There was even a part where a lady was running away and she was running out of a little doorway in a wall. He nailed her. She would still be alive if that guy didn't know how to hit a Muslim while it was running.
I like the part where the chick in the burqa is laying in the street bleeding in agony and going help meeee help meeee like to fly that gets eaten in Beetlejuice. Then he just walks up and shoots her so hard in the head that her burka and her hair poofs up. Holy hilarity, Batman.
The only thing funnier than watching that footage is when I found out that there were children as young as three in the building that he shot up like a heroin convention. I guess they won't grow up to be Palestinian protesters will they?
I mean it's not like theyre people so you can have a good laugh at shit like that, guilt free!
No, Spamtaro and I have built a yurt out of cardboard. Well, I did the heavy lifting but he and Deputy Deputy supervisedAre you still living in a tent because even the people who raised you want nothing to do with you?
I don't know how the situation in Lebanon is, but I I'm for sure on that the only reason muslim women have "equal rights" in Sweden, Britain and the rest of the Western world. Is because the Sharia law isn't in place, and it forces muslims to behave within Western standards. If you actually have talked with muslim men, you would see that they in fact want to implement Sharia law. They think of Western women as all whores and try their very best to live their degenerate ways. Families will deny their sons to be involved with Western women as anything else than for fun. It's common for daughters to be kidnapped to said Islamic country and having their passport taken away from them.Sorry @Vingle , you bigoted fuck, but a faith that can build things likes the Shah mosque or Registan Square can't be pure evil. Behavior towards women varies a lot among predominantly Islamic countries, for instance they are treated very respectfully in Lebanon and women have equal rights in Sweden and Britain. Even in whack job countries like Iran there are serious critics to the status quo like Jafar Panahi and there have been mass protests against their morality police.